<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Propofol vs. Inhalational agents to maintain general anaesthesia in ambulatory and in-patient surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://adreshe.com/en/propofol-vs-inhalational-agents-to-maintain-general-anaesthesia-in-ambulatory-and-in-patient-surgery-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://adreshe.com/en/propofol-vs-inhalational-agents-to-maintain-general-anaesthesia-in-ambulatory-and-in-patient-surgery-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/</link>
	<description>Health Economics &#38; Outcomes Research</description>
	<lastbuilddate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 10:32:49 +0000</lastbuilddate>
	<sy:updateperiod>
	hourly	</sy:updateperiod>
	<sy:updatefrequency>
	1	</sy:updatefrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
</channel>
</rss>